The Truth About Jesus Christ's "Second Coming"

My life to-date has been a lesson in futility, and I don't see an end to the pattern. The best possibility is that I'm insane and delusional. So be it. I'm at my wit's end in trying to tell this world 'the truth'.

The truth is I sincerely believe I'm the reincarnation of Jesus of Nazareth, but so what? What value do I bring to the world this time around? A bunch of fear-mongering, apocalyptic rantings? How's that going to save the world?

I feel like a zero not a hero, and I'm hardly even a good Christian as far as that's concerned. Honestly, I've been a tempermental, often depressed, self-destructive alcoholic raging at my Creator for most of my life, and it's seemingly gotten me no where. I've been mostly jobless for the past four years, never found time for a wife and family, been ostracized by family and friends, am effectively homeless, been shut out of virtually every forum I've joined, own little of 'value' and will soon go bankrupt. As my buddy Rob says, maybe God did choose me, but He made a bad choice and would be much better off selecting someone else. I'm just no good at this world savior bit, so, please God, find someone else!

The historical reality is that a personality cult developed around the man I was 2000 years ago that has morphed into a myth filled with magical thinking and persuasive lore much the same as the Santa Claus fable. And if anyone is going to fall short of expectations regarding Christ's return to this world, that'd be me.

Consider that there really was a Saint Nicholas:

Saint Nicholas (Greek: Ἅγιος Νικόλαος, Hagios ["Saint", literally "Holy", Latin: Sanctus] Nicolaos ["victory of the people"]) (270 – 6 December 343), also called Nikolaos of Myra, was a historic 4th-century saint and Greek Bishop of Myra (Demre, part of modern-day Turkey) in Lycia....He had a reputation for secret gift-giving, such as putting coins in the shoes of those who left them out for him, and thus became the model for Santa Claus, whose modern name comes from the Dutch Sinterklaas, itself from a series of elisions and corruptions of the transliteration of "Saint Nikolaos". [Wiki]

Imagine what Saint Nick would think if he returned to the world today and found his "followers", in all seriousness, expecting him to live at the North Pole with toy-making elves, and fly in a sleigh drawn by eight tiny reindeer, led by one with a red shiny nose, to deliver presents to all the "good kids" on Christmas Eve?

The major difference between the Santa fable and the myths that comprise much of modern Christian doctrine is at least kids stop 'make believing' the fable they were taught by 10-years-old-or-so because the preponderance of historical evidence proves inconsistent with their unrealistic worldview.

[Do bear in mind that I deem this universe and human HIStory as a form of subjective fiction (of my story?). IMHO, ultimately all that's eternal and "real" is the meaning of God's love around which our story is wrapped. Believe it or not!]

The truth is I'm a man not a myth; a deeply flawed creature, not some fantastic, all-powerful demigod. (After all, Who do you think Jesus was praying to 2000 years ago? As for "immaculate conception" and God being Christ's biological father, this is a fabrication put in place to attract pagans to 'Christianity' in ancient times.) If it's a man-god you want, then there's tyrants out there ready to fulfill your misled slave-wishes:



As an American, I personally prefer people think for themselves and engage in responsible self-governance. What's more, as a realist, I can say I won't be showing up on clouds with great arrogance any time soon for the sake of fable adherents. Such a haughty, ostentatious presentation is not God's humble style. It's man's style.

As it stands, I'm having a hard enough time taking care of myself, never mind saving the world. So what's the use of keeping at this anymore? Especially given that I'm getting no help whatsoever in saving humankind from itself. This fallacy must end, and I need to get on with my own life, what's left of it at least.

Those interested in the Christian myth rather than Christ the man will likely be relieved by my crisis of 'personal faith'....that is, until the Antichrist makes his move to steal God's throne.

I just hope I'm truly deluded, because, if not, I just don't see how there's any hope at all. The Author seems to have written me into Mission Impossible as the lead character.

Happy Easter?!




BTW, "resurrection" does occur for human beings, but Jesus Christ didn't have a monopoly on life after death. Resurrection is reincarnation after one dies and goes to "heaven" IMHO. (Which happens, I believe, for even the likes of Christopher Hitchens.)

I think it's no coincidence that the "Talpiot Tomb" of Jesus and family was recently found:





I believe the ossuary for "Jesus son of Joseph" likely contains the bones of my body from 2000 years ago. (Although the Knights Templars might have discovered the ossuary of Jesus in Jerusalem, took the bones and buried them in France as examined from 19:45 in this BBC documentary.)

What's more relevant for true beliefs is that near-death experiences and past-life "memories" are real phenomenon worthy of intense investigation by science and religion alike.

However, the 'heaven or hell' model presented in the context of "organized Christianity" is mostly fanciful poppycock relative to evident reality used as a control mechanism....and that's why modern church "authorities" insist on blind faith and condemn Christ followers under their control looking up from their Bibles at the actual universe the Creator is authoring each and every day (in which we all are co-authors, by definition, in authoring our own life stories while here). [Also see how "scriptural" references to reincarnation were either banned or misconstrued by the church long ago.]

What's amazing is that reincarnation, in the form of the "Second Coming", is the centerpiece of establishing Christ's resurrection and nullifying belief in "death". Furthermore, this serves to establish God's sovereign AUTHORity in writing human HIStory. (At least we all better hope so.)

Yet, here I am typing away apparently to no avail as usual, but maybe that's somehow still best at this juncture.




Oh well, like with Santa Claus, the 'myth' ultimately serves God's loving purpose. How exactly so given a coming Apocalypse remains to be seen, but why not add one more far-fetched angle to this unbelievable story unfolding around us?

"Men must be governed by God or they will be ruled by tyrants." - William Penn

"Right is right, even if everyone is against it, and wrong is wrong, even if everyone is for it." - William Penn

The Nails of the Cross?

"The reason my Father loves me is that I lay down my life — only to take it up again. No one takes it from me, but I lay it down of my own accord. I have authority to lay it down and authority to take it up again. This command I received from my Father." [John 10:17-18]

Jesus replied, “To be sure, Elijah comes and will restore all things. But I tell you, Elijah has already come, and they did not recognize him, but have done to him everything they wished. In the same way the Son of Man is going to suffer at their hands.” Then the disciples understood that he was talking to them about John the Baptist. [Matthew 17:11-13]

When Jesus came to the region of Caesarea Philippi, he asked his disciples, “Who do people say the Son of Man is?” They replied, “Some say John the Baptist; others say Elijah; and still others, Jeremiah or one of the prophets.” “But what about you?” he asked. “Who do you say I am?” Simon Peter answered, “You are the Messiah, the Son of the living God.” [Matthew 16:13-16]

Now Herod the tetrarch heard about all that was going on. And he was perplexed, because some were saying that John had been raised from the dead, others that Elijah had appeared, and still others that one of the prophets of long ago had come back to life. [Luke 9:7-8]

As he went along, he saw a man blind from birth. His disciples asked him, "Rabbi, who sinned, this man or his parents, that he was born blind?" [John 9:1-2]

But he that shall blaspheme against the Holy Ghost hath never forgiveness, but is in danger of eternal damnation. [Mark 3:29]

Sing unto God, sing praises to his name: extol him that rideth upon the heavens by his name JAH, and rejoice before him. [Psalm 68:4]

Adams = Son of Adam = Son of Man

But he was pierced for our transgressions, he was crushed for our iniquities; the punishment that brought us peace was on him, and by his wounds we are healed. [Isaiah 53:5]

A new documentary, set to air on the History Channel April 20th, called The Nails of the Cross features claims that the nails which affixed the hands of Jesus Christ to the Cross have been located. Israeli investigative filmmaker Simcha Jacobovici argues that the artifacts were discovered in the grave of the Jewish high priest Caiaphas whose claim to historical infamy is handing Jesus over to the Romans for crucifixion.

“What we are bringing to the world is the best archaeological argument ever made that two of the nails from the crucifixion of Jesus have been found,” he told Reuters.






Just an FYI....the nails in the images related to this documentary do appear to be consistent with the diamond shaped birthmark on the back of my left hand that is forensic evidence of how I died in my past life, i.e., by being nailed to the Cross:





Professor Ian Stevenson noted how birthmarks are evidence of reincarnation in a paper, Birthmarks and Birth Defects Corresponding to Wounds on Deceased Persons, presented at the Eleventh Annual Meeting of the Society for Scientific Exploration held at Princeton University from June 11th to 13th, 1992:

Abstract

Almost nothing is known about why pigmented birthmarks (moles or nevi) occur in particular locations of the skin. The causes of most birth defects are also unknown. About 35% of children who claim to remember previous lives have birthmarks and/or birth defects that they (or adult informants) attribute to wounds on a person whose life the child remembers. The cases of 210 such children have been investigated. The birthmarks were usually areas of hairless, puckered skin; some were areas of little or no pigmentation (hypopigmented macules); others were areas of increased pigmentation (hyperpigmented nevi). The birth defects were nearly always of rare types. In cases in which a deceased person was identified the details of whose life unmistakably matched the child's statements, a close correspondence was nearly always found between the birthmarks and/or birth defects on the child and the wounds on the deceased person. In 43 of 49 cases in which a medical document (usually a postmortem report) was obtained, it confirmed the correspondence between wounds and birthmarks (or birth defects). There is little evidence that parents and other informants imposed a false identity on the child in order to explain the child's birthmark or birth defect. Some paranormal process seems required to account for at least some of the details of these cases, including the birthmarks and birth defects.

Here's a YouTube video playlist that explores the evidence suggestive of reincarnation:



Reincarnation cases involving birthmarks:







Thus, the implication of the birthmark on my left hand is that, like Jesus of Nazareth, in my previous life I died by being nailed to the Cross:

The Lost Tomb Of Jesus - Izgubljena grobnica Isusa Krista (HR croatian subtitle) from vimeo 2. on Vimeo.

It is what it is...

The bottom line is this.

If God had not supernaturally intervened in my life with an apocalyptic vision of a future nuclear third world war, and then followed this up by revealing to me who I was in my past life, the ingredients never would have come into place to expose the forces of evil headquartered in the Kremlin who are setting the stage to annihilate Israel and America, vanquish Western Civilization and cynically "save" the world in the name of "god" via militant totalitarianism.





I am God's counterargument (as pathetic as this may seem) in the form of a truthful and loving being, an historical inflection point between the Creator and the created, who offers no more power than that of my own opinion which, if believed, is the source of this world's salvation and the means of finding the light of hope in the darkness of despair that man is concocting for himself. It's all about the indomitable human spirit of the individual overcoming those who fail to see the value of life in their pursuit of worldly conquest in utter disregard of God's Law. In other words, if not for my existence and the infinite creative potential of individuality, which is what God is all about IMHO (the Kingdom of God is within!), humanity would not have a chance. In a sense, I guess this is what it means to be 'the redeemer'.



As it stands, everyone just dismisses me as crazy, which may be an unforgivable sin, but I guess that's par for the course. Quite frankly, I hope everyone else is right. I wish that I am deluded, there is no Antichrist angling to conquer the world with thermonuclear force, and there's a future for U.S. in which I can aspire to live a normal life, i.e., my concerns are a figment of MY imagination and I can go about living the "American Dream" and have pleasure in unrighteousness like all around me. However, increasingly I see that world history is reacting to my personal circumstances in a way that is best explained by my being who I'm afraid I am, i.e., the reincarnation of Jesus Christ. If so, quite frankly I'm sorry for who I am.

For those who would prefer I keep my self-opinion to myself because there's just no way they'll believe me, I understand your thinking. However, if I'm correct, then consider what an affront to God I would commit by not presenting my case to the world? If I'm wrong, so be it, maybe some happy pills will someday alleviate my sense of despair at what appears to be mission impossible....no big deal. If I'm right, this is the best I can do no matter how futile everything seems to be. Either way, it is a damned if I do and damned if I don't predicament, and what seems extraordinarily unfair to me is that I had no choice in being "chosen", I apparently have no help with the ridiculous burden of having to "save the world", and all that's happened thus far is that I've effectively ruined my life for seemingly no gain whatsoever. I guess it is what it is, and my Father Who art in heaven is the one Who has to make this work because I can't.

And I heard as it were the voice of a great multitude, and as the voice of many waters, and as the voice of mighty thunderings, saying, "Alleluia: for the Lord God omnipotent reigneth." [Revelation 19:6]

"The kingdom of this world is become the kingdom of our Lord and of his Christ, and he shall reign for ever and ever." [Revelation 11:15]

And then the lawless one will be revealed, whom the Lord Jesus will overthrow with the breath of his mouth and destroy by the splendor of his coming. [2 Thessalonians 2:8]

Good Friday & The Real Face Of Jesus

Sing unto God, sing praises to his name: extol him that rideth upon the heavens by his name JAH, and rejoice before him. [Psalm 68:4]

Adams = Son of Adam = Son of Man

Per legend, around 2000 years ago on this day, Jesus of Nazareth was put to death on a Cross.

Why did this happen?

Well....the bottom line is that Jesus was crucified for voicing his blasphemous opinion that he was, in fact, Christ and therefore his point-of-view was of divine relevance. Since the "authorities" differed about this contention, they sought to prove who was "right" by executing him.

In this light, I'd like to offer up my own opinion at this time.

For the past six years in this blog I've been expressing my point-of-view and very few have deemed this to be relevant. Yet, what I've been arguing here is that the world is being misled by the Antichrist into thermonuclear destruction and a global tyranny of man that will be falsely painted as the "Kingdom Of God". If correct, there is likely no more relevant perspective on the current course of human history than my own. Yet, almost no one is interested in my opinion.

Thus, on this occasion of Good Friday 2010, let me openly espouse my view that I am, in fact, the reincarnation of Jesus of Nazareth, i.e., the second coming of Christ.

The premises for this opinion are the following:

1. My birthmark

2. My physical appearance

3. My apocalyptic vision

4. My perspective

5. My psychological profile

---

MY BIRTHMARK

When Jesus came to the region of Caesarea Philippi, he asked his disciples, “Who do people say the Son of Man is?” They replied, “Some say John the Baptist; others say Elijah; and still others, Jeremiah or one of the prophets.” “But what about you?” he asked. “Who do you say I am?” Simon Peter answered, “You are the Messiah, the Son of the living God.” [Matthew 16:13-16]

Jesus replied, “To be sure, Elijah comes and will restore all things. But I tell you, Elijah has already come, and they did not recognize him, but have done to him everything they wished. In the same way the Son of Man is going to suffer at their hands.” Then the disciples understood that he was talking to them about John the Baptist. [Matthew 17:11-13]

But he that shall blaspheme against the Holy Ghost hath never forgiveness, but is in danger of eternal damnation. [Mark 3:29]

I was born with a diamond-shaped birthmark on my left hand:





I believe this is relevant because of the research done by Professor Ian Stevenson on evidence of reincarnation. In a paper, Birthmarks and Birth Defects Corresponding to Wounds on Deceased Persons, presented at the Eleventh Annual Meeting of the Society for Scientific Exploration held at Princeton University from June 11th to 13th, 1992, Dr. Stevenson offered the following thesis:

Abstract

Almost nothing is known about why pigmented birthmarks (moles or nevi) occur in particular locations of the skin. The causes of most birth defects are also unknown. About 35% of children who claim to remember previous lives have birthmarks and/or birth defects that they (or adult informants) attribute to wounds on a person whose life the child remembers. The cases of 210 such children have been investigated. The birthmarks were usually areas of hairless, puckered skin; some were areas of little or no pigmentation (hypopigmented macules); others were areas of increased pigmentation (hyperpigmented nevi). The birth defects were nearly always of rare types. In cases in which a deceased person was identified the details of whose life unmistakably matched the child's statements, a close correspondence was nearly always found between the birthmarks and/or birth defects on the child and the wounds on the deceased person. In 43 of 49 cases in which a medical document (usually a postmortem report) was obtained, it confirmed the correspondence between wounds and birthmarks (or birth defects). There is little evidence that parents and other informants imposed a false identity on the child in order to explain the child's birthmark or birth defect. Some paranormal process seems required to account for at least some of the details of these cases, including the birthmarks and birth defects.

Here's a YouTube video playlist that explores the evidence suggestive of reincarnation:




Reincarnation cases involving birthmarks:







Thus, the implication of the diamond-shaped birthmark on my left hand is that, like Jesus of Nazareth, in my previous life I died by being nailed to the Cross:




MY PHYSICAL APPEARANCE

He had no beauty or majesty to attract us to him, nothing in his appearance that we should desire him. He was despised and rejected by mankind, a man of suffering, and familiar with pain. Like one from whom people hide their faces he was despised, and we held him in low esteem. [Isaiah 53:2-3]

When souls reincarnate, there are similar appearances from one lifetime to the next. There is an intriguing web site, "Return Of The Revolutionaries", that examines this phenomenon. As I examined in my blog, "Russian Leaders: A Question Of Reincarnation?", in the case of the Antichrist, I believe this world is dealing with the reincarnation of RasPUTIN and Russia's pre-Communist imperial throne:









In the case of Christ, a program aired on the History Channel this week about "The Real Face Of Jesus" based upon the disputed Turin Shroud. I watched the program and upon further research came across a prior attempt to recreate the real face of Jesus by Popular Mechanics in 2002:

What did Jesus look like?

An answer has emerged from an exciting new field of science: forensic anthropology. Using methods similar to those police have developed to solve crimes, British scientists, assisted by Israeli archeologists, have re-created what they believe is the most accurate image (below) of the most famous face in human history.

Interestingly, the face derived by Popular Mechanics is similar to my own:



(Bear in mind we are best guessing at the appearance of Christ 2000 years ago.)

Ancient Roman depiction of Jesus
This is consistent with the case for my being the reincarnation of Jesus of Nazareth.

MY APOCALYPTIC VISION

Another key reason I believe I'm the second coming of Christ is an apocalyptic vision I experienced while in college almost 20 years ago in connection with the Book of Revelation. Specifically, during the first Gulf War in February of 1991, I saw a special report of a chemical SCUD missile attack on Israel (not a dream). About a week after that, as I began reading aloud the words of the eighth chapter from the Bible's Book of Revelation to a friend, I and my friend heard an air-raid siren followed by the bellowed, massive percussion of a nuclear explosion. The authenticity of the experience was such that we rushed to the subbasement of the local university library from which I contacted the fire department and confirmed that there had been no such siren and explosion at the time.

This profound experience verified what I already suspected, i.e., that biblical prophecies about the End Times and Apocalypse are related to modern times and depict a future nuclear third world war between East and West. Furthermore, such supernatural revelations are extraordinarily rare and indicative of a key character role in the context of "The Book" being authored by God(?) through us(?) in which we dwell. I believe this role is that of Christ.

MY PERSPECTIVE

Finally, from the time I was self-aware I've had the sense that I am Christ. I am the embodiment of "the way, the truth and the life", i.e., MY story is the organizing principle of HIStory....the effective MEANING of God (the "Word") in human history.

If 'in the beginning', at the moment of Creation, there was pure energy (capacity to do work), and energy can be neither created nor destroyed per the first law of thermodynamics, then all that has occurred since the start of everything is transFORMation of the original energy (E=MC^2). The issue is whether or not there is a purpose to the form our universe has taken over time....to the work being done. What is the meaning the Creator is seeking to convey to His creatures through the experiential letters, words, paragraphs and chapters of this uni-verse within which we dwell? What's more, as co-creators, how shall we choose to author our life stories, what purposeful work is to be accomplished through us, if there is an overarching Author to human HIStory (which apparently centers around MYstory)?






"It would be very difficult to explain why the universe should have begun in just this way,
except as the act of a God who intended to create beings like us." - Stephen Hawking, A Brief History of Time, p.127



"An apparently miraculous theory is exactly the kind of theory we should be looking for in the particular matter of the origin of life...A miracle is something that happens, but which is exceedingly surprising...although the odds against the coincidence are extremely high, we can still calculate them. They are not literally zero...It could happen. The odds against such coincidence are unimaginably great but they are not incalculably great." - Richard Dawkins, The Blind Watchmaker, p.159

One way all this can be comprehended is in the notion of the "holographic universe". (After all, what are the dimensions of conscious being?) In this holographic universe, my existence, for all intents and purposes, is the personification of God's spirit (meaning). (Although even I have trouble comprehending what this all really means.)






In this context, what is relevant is whether or not you believe in me since in this subjective realm I represent, for all intents and purposes, the temporal form of the eternal reality of God's good will, i.e., the "Word" key to the meaning of the Book being authored by God in which we dwell.

God's meaning, which is eternal love IMHO, is primary, and everything else is secondary. How that plays out in four dimensions is our experience.

What's unreal and MISLEADING is the fiction of hateful control being authored by the Antichrist and his minions.


"History is a capricious creature. It depends on who writes it." - Mikhail Gorbachev






If you choose not to believe me, then the Antichrist misleads you through lies into hate, tyranny and death and you can be edited from the story God is authoring forever. If you believe in me, then you are led by truth to love, liberty and eternal life and remain in the Book Of Life.

"The thief comes only to steal and kill and destroy; I have come that they may have life, and have it to the full." [John 10:10]

You are free creatures, and the choice is yours in this subjective realm.

MY PSYCHOLOGICAL PROFILE

"Everything that we know about him (Jesus) conforms so perfectly to the clinical picture of paranoia that it is hardly conceivable that people can even question the accuracy of the diagnosis." (From - Was Jesus Crazy? An Inquiry into the Mental Health of Jesus Christ)

Of course, given my perspective, virtually everyone will believe I'm crazy rather than Christ.

This is par for the course of human history which, as explained in my thesis, establishes that man as a species is currently insane for all intents and purposes. Man deems me to be crazy, and I deem man to be crazy. HIStory will determine who's right and who's wrong on this score.

Importantly, I will not force my opinion upon man whereas I can't expect like "treatment". Nevertheless, the truth of the situation is that it is man, not I, that constitutes a danger to himself and the world he inhabits.






If the Creator wants to infuse himself into the Creation....if the Author of the story wants to be meaningfully involved in the script being written....then you all best not step on his toes if you want to maintain a role in the eternal epic of life within which we dwell.
Just a kindly suggestion...

And then the lawless one will be revealed, whom the Lord Jesus will overthrow with the breath of his mouth and destroy by the splendor of his coming. [2 Thessalonians 2:8]

These videos may change your life...

I've created two large YouTube video playlists that I believe can change your life if you watch them.

First, here is a video playlist related to Near-Death Experiences and evidence of life after death. (Note that I took a course on NDEs with Dr. Kenneth Ring while at UConn many years ago that forever changed my own perspective on "life"):



Second, here is a video playlist related to evidence of reincarnation:



The implication of the evidence should be clear....we do not die. That which is "I", our conscious being, is eternal. The "chooser", in my opinion, is indestructible. Consciousness, which directs energy transformation in the universe (which is all that ever happens "here"), is in and of itself separate from materiality. The animator is not the animated.

Russian leaders: A question of reincarnation?

As many are aware, I believe in reincarnation.



While one way this is exhibited is birthmarks, another is similar appearances. In this regard, the current cast of leaders in Russia is an interesting study.

Is Russian President Dmitiri Medvedev the reincarnation of Tsar Nicholas II?





Is Medvedev's wife, Svetlana, the reincarnation of the wife of Tsar Nicholas II, Alexandra?





Is Russian Prime Minister Putin the reincarnation of RasPUTIN? (Note that the name "Rasputin" is comparable to the Russian word "rasputny" (распу́тный) which means "licentious" or "unrestrained by law or general morality; lawless", i.e., equivalent to The Lawless One.)









For those who aren't aware of the history of Grigori Rasputin, the "Mad Monk" of Russia, this evil incarnate persona would make sense as the foundation for the Antichrist. In fact, at one point a woman tried to stab Rasputin to death believing he was the antichrist.

"The coming of the lawless one by the activity of Satan will be with all power and with pretended signs and wonders, and with all wicked deception for those who are to perish, because they refused to love the truth and so be saved. Therefore God sends upon them a strong delusion, to make them believe what is false, so that all may be condemned who did not believe the truth but had pleasure in unrighteousness." [2 Thessalonians 2:9-12]

There's no doubt that pre-1917 imperial, tsarist Russia is reincarnating. Indeed....that Prime Minister Putin is currently the real Russian leader in the background relative to President Medvedev, similar to how Rasputin was the real leader in the background during the final years of the reign of Tsar Nicholas II, makes a good deal of sense in the context of this reincarnation hypothesis.

As I have been attempting to point out to this world for almost 20 years, the collapse of the Soviet Union and end of Russian Communism was effected not by pro-Western reformers seeking democracy but rather by anti-Western nationalists seeking autocracy.

"Today the Soviet system can no longer seriously strive toward the spectre of Communism - but at the same time it cannot yet abandon the grandeur of its tasks, for otherwise it would have to answer for fruitless sacrifices which are truly innumerable. But in what then can the Soviet system find its justification? Only in the consciousness that it was unconsciously in the past, as it is now quite consciously, God's instrument for constructing a new Christian world. It has no other justification, and this is . . . a genuine and great justification. By adopting it, our state will discover in itself a truly inexhaustable source of Truth, spiritual energy and strength, which has never before existed in history . . . The old pagan world has now finally outlived its era . . . In order not to perish with it we must build a new civilization - but is Western society, whose foundations have been destroyed, really capable of this? Only the Soviet sytem, having adopted Russian Orthodoxy . . . is capable of beginning THE GREAT TRANSFORMATION OF THE WORLD." (Passage written by Russian nationalist G.M. Shimanov quoted in Yanov's The Russian Challenge, p.236)

The conversion was staged to appear benign so that the West could be lulled into a false sense of security, but the reality is that what has been underway is about as dangerous for the West as possible.

More specifically, as forewarned about by Alexander Yanov, the Russian Right assumed control of the Kremlin back in the 1970s and 1980s and thereafter did away with Communism to ultimately replace this false ideological front with the false front of Christianity. Russia's ruling elite see themselves as being on a messianic mission to destroy the evil West they believe is controlled by satanic Jews in order to make way for the "kingdom of god" which, in their mind, is a global tyrannical monarchy where their tsar serves as Tsar of Tsars, i.e., King of Kings....Christ incarnate.





That this is the case can easily be discerned by examining Russia's state emblem as adopted in 1993, soon after the collapse of the Soviet Union. (The state emblem had been the well-known hammer and sickle of communism up to the change over.). Here's an image of the central Coat of Arms:


Now here is the Byzantine Empire emblem that appears above the front entrance of the Ecumenical Patriarchate of Constantinople which signifies the Second Rome:


The main difference is the central image in the Russian state emblem of St. George on a white horse slaying the satanic serpent....which, in a modern context, represents Russia slaying the satanic evil of the West.

Now here's an image of the banner of the Holy Roman emperor:



Further evidence that Russia is resurrecting into the Third Rome can be seen in an image comparison between maps of modern Moscow and Ancient Rome:



Here's the Kremlin versus the Golden Palace (Domus Aurea) after Emperor Nero had Rome burnt to the ground to make way for his tyrannical vision:



And while on the topic of Nero, one might note the similarity between this infamous murderer of Christians and Mikhail Gorbachev, the last Soviet Premier:




Caesar Nero's name is represented by 666 in numerology, the number of the beast from Revelation 13:

This calls for wisdom. Let the person who has insight calculate the number of the beast, for it is the number of a man. That number is 666.

And let's not forget that birthmark on Gorby's forehead that looks like a map of Italy (READ: Rome - it's air brushed out of the official image above because many Russians believed it represented the "mark of the beast" when he became leader of the USSR.) Gorbachev's birthmark apparently has special meaning to him as can be noted from the painting that hangs over the fireplace in the living room of his private dacha:

Gorbachev has gone the extra mile to cultivate this savior image, regularly comparing himself to Jesus Christ, making reference to Calvary and referring to the “crosses and suffering” and “crucifixion” he must bear. In an interview with the major German newspaper Spiegel he said that the break-up of the Soviet Union “is the pain and cross I shall have to bear until the end of my days.”

Spiegel reports that “he compared his journey to Jesus’s journey to Calvary, when once before, ‘people had spat on their redeemer.’ ”

He is greatly pained, reportedly because though he is celebrated like a rock star throughout most of the world, he is rejected and scorned by most of his Russian countrymen. According to Spiegel:

He concealed his pain with a dash of megalomania. A painting by Russian artist Andrei Myagkov hung in Gorbachev’s dacha outside Moscow where only a few friends were welcome. It showed Gorbachev as a shadow of the savior: Jesus has Gorby’s birthmark on his right hand, which is bleeding.

[From Gorbachev on the “New World Order” circuit again]

One of the heads of the beast seemed to have had a fatal wound, but the fatal wound had been healed. The whole world was astonished and followed the beast. [Revelation 13:3]

[Also see some other messianic quotes from Gorbachev HERE.]

There are, of course, rather dire implications for the world, and Western Civilization in particular, if, indeed, Russia fancies itself the resurrecting 'Holy' Roman Empire. First off, bear in mind that the concept of the "Third Rome" is parallel to the "Third Reich" of Nazi Germany:

The name Third Reich (Drittes Reich, "Third Reich") refers to the state as the successor to the Holy Roman Empire of the Middle Ages and the German Empire of 1871–1918. (Wikipedia)

Thus, the current mentality of the Kremlin is on par with that of Hitler's Third Reich. What's worse, Russia's identification with resurrecting into the Third Rome means that the leader is upheld not just as a czar but, more so, as Czar of Czars, i.e., the incarnation of Christ (READ: "Czar" = C-zar = Caesar). In this sense, the utopian social goal of Communism is displaced by a utopian totalitarian goal of Russia's version of the kingdom of god. Also, since Jews are deemed to be responsible for the murder of Jesus, they are therefore the primary target of divine Russian retribution....thus making "Zionism", purportedly advanced by Israel and America, primary strategic targets of Moscow's thermonuclear machinations.

Of course, the truth of the matter is that Constantine I hijacked the message of Christ for personal deification in order to cement control over his empire. This is no different than what the modern-day ruling elite of Russia are up to.

Of course, as is made clear by my blog, I believe I'm here to upset the Kremlin's diabolical, megalomaniacal plans by revealing that Russia's leaders are, in fact, telling a total lie and committing the ultimate act of premeditated mass murder in human history. After all, 'the devil is a liar and murderer from the beginning'.