Moscow Subway Bombings - More Lies from Lubyanka

Why do people believe the nonsensical lies of the KGB/FSB (or whatever the heck they want to call themselves at any given historical point)?

The latest historical deception is the reported bombing of subway trains in Moscow yesterday with the primary attack occurring at the Lubyanka Square station under the headquarters of the KGB/FSB.

Within an hour or so of the purported double bombings in Moscow, there was an accurate count on the number of dead. Within several hours the whole case had been solved and Chechen "Black Widow" female suicide bombers were blamed. By late-afternoon in Russia the whole scene had been cleaned and the subways were operating again. What's more, Russian President Medvedev appeared in a photo-op at the scene of the bombing for a memorial to the fallen in time for the evening news:



Are you freegin kidding me?

I intentionally held back from posting this blog for 24 hours because I wanted to see if authentic independent cell phone videos and pictures would emerge on the internet showing carnage and chaos consistent with the reported attacks, i.e., 39 people killed and hundreds injured. After all, in the Moscow subway system there would have been thousands of witnesses, many with camera-enabled cell phones. Yet, all that has come out are the videos and images put out by RussiaToday, the English-speaking Russian news source that feeds endless misinformation to the West:



As usual, Western media has regurgitated the lies out of Lubyanka (literally in this case) without an ounce of critical judgment and, with even less suspicion, the deception is believed by the masses. The system of strategic deception has become so streamlined, Russia's intelligence services are getting somewhat sloppy IMHO. This story would hardly rate as a B-grade movie put together by some college kids with a smoke bomb, a bucket of cow's blood and a few dozen buddies willing to act as victims and emergency personnel.

In the past the KGB/FSB has been known to commit acts of truly violent terror against the Russian people for purposes of strategic disinformation like the 1999 apartment bombings in southern Russia. Alexander Litvinenko wrote a book about this that he paid for with his life after he was assassinated by Russian intelligence officers with Polonium:



What's tragic and sad is I can point out to you all the endless BS being fed to the world by the Kremlin and STILL NO ONE SEEMS TO GET IT.

At what point do people start to figure out they are being lied to by the most evil force in human history? When mushroom clouds are climbing over nearby cities? What the heck is wrong with everybody? Has everyone lost the capacity for critical reasoning in the face of the Evil One?

Jeepers!

THINK FREE OR DIE TRYING!!!

The Obama "Dossier"?

WOW!



They got that one! Try again:



From my own research, most if not all of what this video purports to be the case is factually sound.

Note that the reason U.S. intelligence is closely watching "Renegade" is because that is the Secret Service code name for Barack Obama, so he is being watched only in the sense to protect him from what I can ascertain. Unfortunately, America's law enforcement and intelligence services have been usurped by someone that appears to be a Communist mole of some sort.

The American people have no one to blame more than themselves for this predicament since, when given the choice between a patriotic war hero and an anti-American leftist, they opted for the latter.

Why?

Because, as is spelled out rather clearly in my blog, Americans are choosing a path to self-destruction....mainly through their unwillingness to think freely and question the pleasant lies they are being told. If thought is no longer free, body will no longer be free thereafter. That's the hard truth.

I suggest we choose liberty, not tyranny, but no one seems to be interested in following me.

So be it. That's your perogative as you were created free to choose for yourselves.

The Mystery of Barack Obama Continues...

Going into the 2008 Presidential election, a wealth of information was uncovered about Barack Obama suggestive of a Communist background.

After the election, the Western Journalism Center published an incredibly important piece of genuine investigative journalism (which is hard to find nowadays), dubbed "The Mystery Of Barack Obama Continues", that has apparently gone unnoticed.

To understand the direction the above article is heading, here's some more about Weather Underground leaders Bill Ayers and Bernadine Dohrn.

Here's a couple of related stories from CNN and Fox News:





Now fast forward to the segment on domestic terrorism a little more than 55 minutes into this profound 1982 documentary, The KGB Connections, about KGB activity in North America:



If U.S. law enforcement is intent on protecting and defending the U.S. Constitution, then they need to get to work looking into the background of the current President. Furthermore, they need to disobey orders inconsistent with their mandate.

‘The BIG Black Lie’

‘The BIG Black Lie’ Author Debates MSNBC’s Shuster on Tea Pa
Uploaded by burghnews. - News videos from around the world.

Comrade J

In 2000, Sergei Tretyakov become one of the highest-ranking and most recent Russian spies ever to defect to the United States.

In 2008, he had a book published detailing his story:



In 2008, NPR ran a story on Tretyakov with the release of his book. (LISTEN)

Tretyakov may be added to my list of the "great defectors", although I must research further to ascertain whether or not he is bona fide or a source of strategic disinformation.

The following interview of Tretyakov on CNN suggests he may be the real deal:



There is a commentator on YouTube indicating that Tretyakov could be a false defector based upon his suggestion that Russia and China have adversarial relations, a point with which I would concur. (Tretyakov might simply not have been in a position to know the truth on this score.)

Who really is Barack Obama?

I suspect that "patriot" blogs like this one are being monitored by the Feds this weekend because of the protest activity in D.C. over the health care reform bill. I know the majority of such "monitors" are actually patriotic at heart, even if misdirected, so I'd like to offer some proper direction.

First off, please keep in mind the oath you took:

I [name] do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God.

Your allegiance must be to the Constitution and not with politicians that may be usurping the Constitution.

In this regard, I'd like to bring your attention to a background investigation on names, addresses and social security numbers associated with "Barack Obama" performed by Sankey Investigations, Inc..

Now keep in mind that "Barack Obama" is a unique name. In fact, according to U.S. census data there is precisely one person in the U.S. that has that name, i.e., the President.

Yet, a record search on "Barack Obama" yields some 80 different addresses and 27 different social security numbers according to the Sankey investigation.

Notably, the one social security number that is most connected to Obama starts with the digits "042", which means the number was issued in Connecticut, a state where Barack has never resided.

Has Barack Obama been using false identities throughout his life?



If so, it would explain why the President is not releasing almost all records from his past including:

Original birth certificate — Not released
Obama/Dunham marriage license — Not released
Soetoro/Dunham marriage license — Not released
Soetoro adoption records — Not released
Besuki School application — Released
Punahou School records — Not released
Selective Service Registration — Released and under suspicion
Occidental College records — Not released
Passport (Pakistan) — Not released
Columbia College records — Not released
Columbia thesis — Not released
Harvard College records — Not released
Harvard Law Review articles — None (maybe 1, unsigned?)
Baptism certificate — None
Medical records — Not released
Illinois State Senate records — None
Illinois State Senate schedule — Lost
Law practice client list — Not released
University of Chicago scholarly articles — Lost

Is the President hiding his past use of aliases and incorrect social security numbers by not disclosing such records?

Identity fraud is a felony and would certainly constitute grounds for impeaching a sitting U.S. President.

Of course, a far more disturbing question is: Why would Barack Obama have used false identification throughout his life?

In other words, who does he really work for?



If not the American people, then there is a serious national security concern.

The bottom line is, for the Feds reading through my blog, I suggest you turn your investigative powers around on those who have ordered you to look here. That, my fellow Americans, is where I believe you'll find a significant threat to the rule of law and the U.S. Constitution which you are obliged to deal with.

A Quick Review Of Some MISLEADING History

"History is a capricious creature. It depends on who writes it." - Mikhail Gorbachev, 1996

Let me strongly recommend Robert Buchar's new book, And Reality Be Damned:



This book is a transcript of his documentary film that he hasn't released because he can't come up with $40K for video footage rights.



Buchar's documentary contains information critical to the survival of Western Civilization, and he can't get $40K in financing to complete it. Thus, we are set to lose around a quadrillion dollars in wealth and most of our populations and social infrastructure because no one would literally pay a penny for the truth. That's how insanely selfish and self-deluded the West has become.

BTW, I provided Mr. Buchar the idea for the name of his documentary film. Initially he was going to call it, "The Collapse of Communism: Take 2", but now he's going with my suggestion of, The Collapse of Communism: The Untold Story.

I just wish I had $40K to contribute.

Tonight I've been reviewing footage of the fall of the Soviet Union upon the August 1991 "Potemkin Coup" in Moscow. It was so clearly staged and absolute BS, I just scratch my head at why the West believed 'em. The choice to accept this pleasant lie could literally cost Western Civilization its very existence.

First consider top KGB defector Anatoliy Golitsyn's incisive analysis of the August 1991 coup:

According to my assessment, the Soviet 'coup' and its 'failure' constituted a grandiose display of deception - a provocation. The 'ineptitude' of the participants in the 'coup' and the 'failure' of it were skillfully planned and executed. The main argument in support of this assessment is that the Soviet military, the KGB, the Party and leading media figures apparently had neither the skill to launch a successful coup nor the guts to crush resistance to it. This is news indeed!

Facing a real crisis in Hungary in 1956, the same forces displayed exceptional skill, know-how and determination in crushing a genuine revolt. Knowledge of the Soviet mentality and of Moscow's record of ruthless action has convinced this analyst that the Soviet military, the Party and the leaders of the media all have the skill, the will and the courage to crush genuine resistance and opposition. They did not display them on this occasion because the abortive 'coup' was carried out in accordance with Party instructions; and it was the Party and the Komsomol themselves which organized the alleged resistance to it.

The real participants both in the 'coup' and in the 'failure' were some 20,000 or more chosen Komsomol and Party members in Moscow with two or three tank divisions guided by their political commissars and a handful of dedicated Party officials and generals who sacrificed their prestige in the interests of the Party's strategy and under the guidance of its strategists. The calculated nature of the 'coup' and its timing show that it was staged by the Russian, President Yeltsin, to save the essence of the Union at the time of transition to a new form of federation.

The abortive 'coup' and the 'resistance' to it were carefully calculated displays intended primarily for the West. This explains why Western media contacts with Moscow were not curtailed. On the contrary, the big guns of the Soviet media like Vitaliy Korotich and representatives of the Arbatov Institute were on hand both in Moscow and in the United States to 'help' the Western media with their interpretation of developments in the USSR. The episode shows how well Soviet strategists like Arbatov and his experts on the American media have mastered the art of projecting such displays for consumption by the American media, and throughout the West.

The Soviet strategists sought to underline for the West the dramatic ineptitude of the 'coup' and the spectacular courage and resistance displayed by the new 'Russian democrats' and their leader Yeltsin in 'defending' the Soviet Parliament- their symbolic equivalent of 'The White House'. The main external objective of the display was to demonstrate to the West that Soviet democratization is genuine, that it has the support of the people and that it is working. [Golitsyn, The Perestroika Deception, p.137]

Now consider what a farce the whole affair was from a key Time magazine article from September 1991:

It might have been the most widely advertised coup in history. Rumors and warnings had begun as early as the summer of 1990. According to British intelligence, elements of the Soviet army and KGB actually rehearsed a coup (under the guise of a countercoup) in February of this year. June brought what was soon called the "constitutional-coup attempt." Prime Minister Valentin Pavlov asked the Supreme Soviet for the authority to issue decrees without Mikhail Gorbachev's knowledge, but was rebuffed. In late July hardliners published an announcement appealing for "those who recognize the terrible plight into which our country has fallen" to support dramatic action to end disorder. They might as well have put up billboards shouting COUP!

In hindsight, even the timing seems screamingly obvious. Gorbachev had designated Tuesday, Aug. 20, for the ceremonial signing of a new union treaty with the presidents of the Russian and Kazakh republics; other republics were expected to sign later. The treaty would transfer so many powers -- over taxes, natural resources, even the state security apparatus -- to the republics as to make restoring ironfisted Kremlin control of the whole country impossible. Moreover, a new national Cabinet would have been named by representatives of the republics. Some of the eventual coup leaders, including KGB chairman Vladimir Kryuchkov, Defense Minister Dmitri Yazov and Interior Minister Boris Pugo, would almost certainly have lost their jobs. The plotters could not afford to let that treaty go into effect.

Yet Gorbachev by his own testimony was totally unprepared. To some scholars and Soviet officials that appears so odd as to suggest that the President himself had staged a Potemkin coup to win domestic and foreign sympathy. But that seems farfetched. More probably, the very volume and intensity of coup talk had dulled his political antennae; the cry of wolf was sounding old and tired. Alexander Yakovlev, a close adviser, claimed after it was all over that he had even given Gorbachev the names of some likely -- and, as it turned out actual -- plotters. The President, according to Yakovlev, had scoffed that they "lack the courage to stage a coup."

..........

Yet it was obvious even that early that the coup was ill planned and curiously halfhearted. The plotters neglected to carry out that sine qua non of successful coups: the immediate arrest of popular potential enemies before they could begin organizing a resistance. In particular, the failure to make sure that Yeltsin was taken into custody (there were some reports that an attempt at an arrest was made, but botched) was fatal. Inexplicably, the putschists did not even pull the plug on the communications of anyone except Gorbachev. Bush and other foreign leaders were amazed at how easily they could get through by telephone to Yeltsin; he in turn seems to have had no difficulty coordinating action with other coup opponents across the country.

Most successful coup organizers also begin by moving reliable troops into key positions. Yet U.S. intelligence analysts, poring early Monday over satellite pictures taken during the previous two days, detected no evidence of any unusual troop movements. The Soviet plotters used troops and equipment that happened to be on hand in Moscow and other cities and gave the soldiers only the vaguest idea of what they were supposed to be doing. In Moscow some seemed to think they were participating in an odd sort of parade or drill.

Far from being prepared to crush opposition, the troops were obviously under orders to avoid confrontation if possible and above all not to shoot. Citizens shouted "Fascist!" or worse at the troops, scrawled swastikas in the dirt on tanks parked outside the Russian Parliament Building, climbed aboard armored personnel carriers to argue with the commanders and urge them to turn back -- all with impunity. When the coup leaders decreed a curfew from 11 p.m. to 5 a.m., the soldiers made no attempt to enforce it.

In Leningrad troops based inside the city stayed in their barracks throughout the coup. Armored assault units headquartered nearby at one point started moving on the old czarist capital, but reformist Mayor Anatoli Sobchak -- another leader the coup conspirators foolishly left at large -- persuaded the tankmen to halt outside the city.

..........

At 5 p.m. Monday the conspirators finally called a press conference to introduce themselves. Their performance was a disaster. Far from coming across as a take-charge group, they appeared nervous and half apologetic. They gave a preposterous excuse for assuming authority (Gorbachev was too tired and ill to retain command); stressed that the coup was a constitutional devolution of authority to Yanayev, although it clearly was not; and proclaimed a highly dubious devotion to continued reform. Junta member Vasili Starodubtsev sniffled continually, and Yanayev seemed twitchy. As Gorbachev later commented, "They said I was sick, but they were the ones whose hands were shaking."

Gorbachev apparently was listening if not watching. His security guards stayed with him at the Foros dacha, scrounged up some old radio receivers that had been forgotten but not discarded, and set up a jury-rigged antenna so they could monitor foreign radio coverage of the coup. Gorbachev later praised the reporting of the British Broadcasting Corp., Radio Liberty and Voice of America -- without seeming to recognize the irony that all three networks had been jammed by the Soviet government not so very long ago. Though he said he had been subjected to intense "psychological pressure," this apparently consisted of isolation rather than any actual interference with his activities. The President spent part of his time drafting an angry condemnation of the coup, and was so incensed at the reports of his illness that he made four videotapes of himself (he did not say how he got hold of a camera) to prove he was not sick at all.

..........

Tuesday afternoon brought one telltale indication that the junta was losing what grip it had established. After obediently reporting all the pronouncements of the so-called Emergency Committee and little else, TASS suddenly began interspersing them with reports of the burgeoning resistance. For example, it let Soviet citizens know that Aleksei II, Patriarch of the Russian Orthodox Church and a signer of a December appeal for a law-and-order crackdown, had come out against the coup. (Blogger's note: A telling sign of the trend to come...)

Now go ahead and watch news footage of the events in 1991 and think to yourself, could this really have happened unless it was instigated from the top-down per a larger plan?

Here's the historical deception according to how our youth are taught:



Here's old news footage where Western media reports on events without little or no critical judgment:






ESPECIALLY WATCH THIS ONE!
(Note how President Bush, Sr. @ 1:40 is aghast at the notion that Gorbachev would be involved in an act of mass deception.
This is a former head of the CIA befuddled by the idea that Moscow would engage in strategic deception!)






Now were the events in 1991 as they appeared?

The unfurling of a giant Russian flag, probably the largest ever created in the world, in the streets of Moscow was particularly rich:





So Boris Yeltsin's 'spontaneous' opposition to the coup just happened to have a quarter-mile long Russian flag sitting around for the throngs of protesters to use to signify the return to Russia? Golly....no props and staging there for Western media coverage. [/SARCASM]

The fireworks capping off the Potemkin coup "failure" and cranes brought in, without resistance, to pull down statues of Lenin and KGB founder Felix Dzerzhinsky were also particularly telling.

The purported "revolution" that occurred in the Soviet Union in 1991 was nothing but staged street theater intended for Western audiences. (Hence the unfettered, if not highly facilitated, access of the Western media to report on the events of the day at the time.)

Unfortunately, only now has it become more clear what the goal has been of the strategic deception kicked off almost 20 years ago.

The KGB effectively threw a coup in Russia and kicked out the Communist party so the secret police organization could run the show without restraint.

Our national tragedy (as well as the tragedy of all other former communist countries) is that there was no clear defeat of the ruling communist system, no Nuremberg-style trial of its crimes, no vigorous lustration (de-communisation) process. The West was quick to celebrate the end of the Cold War and the victory of democracy in the former Iron Curtained countries, but in reality there was no change of "elites" there. The former communist "nomenklatura" has remained in the position of power in all branches of the government, albeit under a different name.

One particular part of the communist "nomenklatura" - the KGB - is of special interest to us. The Soviet secret police/intelligence service, originally called VChK, was defined by Lenin as an "armed detachment of the Party," and remained as such throughout Soviet history, while changing its name every few years (VChK, OGPU, NKVD, MGB, KGB, FSB...). Its prime task was to safeguard the interests of the Party and of its ideology, both at home and abroad.

By the 1970s, like anybody else, they came to resent the ideological supervision of the Party which they perceived as hampering their efficiency. They vigorously supported Gorbachev in his "perestroika" campaign, and he, in turn, has heavily relied on their services. Their task, (as it was the task of Gorbachev's leadership), was to salvage the remnants of the Soviet system, not to abandon it.

- Vladimir Bukovsky, 2004

---

When people talk about the KGB they generally think about its visible acts of repression, brutal interrogations and gulags. There is little public awareness of the fact that the KGB, which is calling the shots in today’s Russia, holds the launching codes for 6,000 nuclear missiles. Even fewer people know that the KGB has also been charged to develop, produce, stockpile and guard the country’s weapons of mass destruction.

- Ion Pacepa, 2004

This same KGB had infiltrated the Russian Orthodox Church and concluded that Christianity would make for a much more effective ideological front than Communism and has set the stage for establishing a global, tyrannical 'kingdom of god' that will in fact be the totalitarian dictatorship of the Antichrist. The means to that end is world war three and the prophetic Apocalypse.

"Today the Soviet system can no longer seriously strive toward the spectre of Communism - but at the same time it cannot yet abandon the grandeur of its tasks, for otherwise it would have to answer for fruitless sacrifices which are truly innumerable. But in what then can the Soviet system find its justification? Only in the consciousness that it was unconsciously in the past, as it is now quite consciously, God's instrument for constructing a new Christian world. It has no other justification, and this is . . . a genuine and great justification. By adopting it, our state will discover in itself a truly inexhaustable source of Truth, spiritual energy and strength, which has never before existed in history . . . The old pagan world has now finally outlived its era . . . In order not to perish with it we must build a new civilization - but is Western society, whose foundations have been destroyed, really capable of this? Only the Soviet sytem, having adopted Russian Orthodoxy . . . is capable of beginning THE GREAT TRANSFORMATION OF THE WORLD." (Passage written by Russian nationalist G.M. Shimanov quoted in Yanov's The Russian Challenge, p.236, 1987)

---

"If we presume the coming transformation of the Communist Party into the Russian Orthodox Party of the Soviet Union, we would obtain truly the ideal state, one which would fulfill the historical destiny of the Russian people. It is a question of the Orthodoxization of the entire world." (Gennadii Shimanov)

But do Americans really want to be delivered from the Evil One? Or are they too busy delighting in wickedness?

And then the lawless one will be revealed, whom the Lord Jesus will overthrow with the breath of his mouth and destroy by the splendor of his coming. The coming of the lawless one will be in accordance with the work of Satan displayed in all kinds of counterfeit miracles, signs and wonders, and in every sort of evil that deceives those who are perishing. They perish because they refused to love the truth and so be saved. For this reason God sends them a powerful delusion so that they will believe the lie and so that all will be condemned who have not believed the truth but have delighted in wickedness. [2 Thessalonians 2:8-12]

Some weekend music...

I know you're watching, so please observe closely:









Don't cross God, you will lose badly.

Now get with the program...

Goldman Sucks on 60 Minutes

Sometimes it takes popular comedians to inform Americans of the twisted reality:

The Daily Show With Jon Stewart	Mon - Thurs 11p / 10c
In Dodd We Trust
www.thedailyshow.com
Daily Show Full Episodes Political Humor Health Care Reform

Goldman Sucks and the banking elite are at the heart of the greatest Ponzi scheme fraud and theft in human history: the private banking industry.

Now the government has sacrificed the full faith and credit of the United States of America to perpetuate the con while the American people, i.e., the taxpayers responsible for the impossible tab to come, have sat idly by, too busy entertaining themselves to death.

This will not last IMHO, but I imagine the Evil One will get to us before the evildoers on Wall Street are brought to justice under American law. Of course, some might conclude the coming war on world capitalism by the forces of world communism is the historical form justice is taking based upon God's law. The West, knee-deep in sin, avarice and material excess, opted not to see the conflict coming (as so "incentivised") and thereby made it happen.

I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies. If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around [the banks] will deprive the people of all property until their children wake-up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered. The issuing power should be taken from the banks and restored to the people, to whom it properly belongs. - Thomas Jefferson

Thought of the day...

So in the beginning, with the singularity at the beginning of time, there was pure "energy" without form.

This energy has been neither created nor destroyed since the "Big Bang", it has simply taken form and then transformed within the system.

Hence, the history of the universe is a process of transformation into an increasingly complex ORGANIZED system.

The direction of that transformation we know has become governed by the unfolding laws of physics and nature over time when it comes to motion and relations between "things". This is true both macroscopically (stars, planets, water, etc.) and microscopically (intracellular, DNA, etc.).

In terms of the extremely larger consider the following:

"It would be very difficult to explain why the universe should have begun in just this way, except as the act of a God who intended to create beings like us." - Stephen Hawking, 'A Brief History of Time', p.127

In terms of the extremely small, consider the following:

You have to understand the paradox of the universe. The universe can only exist if there are sentient beings (consciousness) able to observe it. If there are no sentient beings, then the universe exists as a wave, without any form or structure. Only after sentient beings observe the universe does the wave collapse into the beautiful firmament of stars, planets, galaxies, quasars, etc. Thus, the single most important thing for life to exist is a universe that provides the right quantum laws that allow for sentient beings to evolve. That is, the gravitation strength is this and the strong force is that and the weak force is this and the electromagnetic force is that. If any of the four forces deviate by a slight bit, then the conditions of the quantum laws will not be correct for life to exist. It is the precise tuning of our laws of quantum mechanics that is the most important factor to create sentient life. (source)

But what shaped the laws of the universe? What has the system organized for? And how did the motion of "things", the process of transformation over time, lead to incredibly well-organized sentient creatures like ourselves to perceive and examine the universe in which we emerged?

"We got lucky", does not cut it for an answer and is statistically nonsensical. (One wonders why such a view has become popular when so clearly unreasonable, but I guess that's part of the "secular" subjectivism of the day. There's no room for God in a universe man wants to control.)

As human beings, our consciousness is always now, i.e., caught between the past and the future.

In this context, we act as "choosers", i.e., we direct motion, determine the relationships, between the past and the future. So for us it should be obvious what the source of the direction of transformation is: consciousness. (What we experience as consciousness, i.e., the "I"). I do not believe that such direction started with human beings, or even with sentient, self-directing life forms (although the latter may constitute everything).

If God is the Alpha and the Omega, then universal consciousness, of which our individual consciousness is a part, is the Delta IMHO - the point of change over time between the beginning and the end that determines what "work" the transformative energy of the universe will do.

Human beings act in the middle of, and forge new laws for, the flow between the past and the future.

This can be in the form of how we manipulate our environment to serve our purposes (tools and technologies, which means everything from power plants to toilet paper, are developed by us in transforming our environment to serve our needs and wants - this is our "work"). This can be in the form of the rules of conduct we set for ourselves. In so doing this we are inadvertently creating a new increasingly conscious being, i.e., global society. Of course, our individual consciousnesses are intertwined with this new being as collective consciousness. This collective consciousness, in turn, chooses the direction of the new social being into the future. (This occurs at many levels, from the household to the community to the nation to the world.) The emergent technologies that our personal design and collective will has shaped has led to higher and higher levels of inter-connectivity and interdependence thus "collective thought and choice" becoming better tuned to our shared environment. In this sense, humankind is now a sentient, conscious being in its own right and we are comparable to cells within the organism, i.e., the higher life form of society as-a-whole.

Of course, this logic can be applied in reverse as well. After all, the formation of galaxies, stars, elements, planets, reproductive biological organisms, etc., all fed into the realization of us and our current consciousness. That consciousness is intertwined with all the ingredients that comprise human life forms. After all, we are effectively animated stardust.

Now, here's the rub.

I believe the animator is not the animated (animal). Consciousness is not the perceiver.

This means that that which is "I", our conscious being, is immaterial....it is not a function of our flesh and, in a sense, is not really "here".

The evidence of this is pretty clear with regard to near-death experiences and reincarnation.

When human bodies die, the associated consciousness continues to exist.

This is explained by this model.

What's more, this hypothesis explains how the transformation of the universe has led to human beings so efficiently. At any given moment in time in the history of the universe, there has been a collective consciousness directing the course of change. But how was information perceived and used to shape collective choice between the past and the future before complex biological life forms like ourselves existed?

Are energy forms 'sentient beings' at the quantum level?

What would have constituted a "better" future relative to the past, i.e., better relative to what, at each point along the time line of universal transformation?

Also, do changes to our bodies affect changes to our conscious being, e.g., drugs, brain damage, etc. Thus, changes in the animated (animal) affect the animator, so maybe this is all wrong. Which comes first, the animator or the animated. The evidence suggests the former....consciousness is derived from the Prime Mover.

Back to the drawing board...

The Devil In The Church

Chief Catholic exorcist, Father Gabriele Amorth, says that the Devil is in the Vatican:

Sex abuse scandals in the Roman Catholic Church are proof that that "the Devil is at work inside the Vatican", according to the Holy See's chief exorcist.

Father Gabriele Amorth, 85, who has been the Vatican's chief exorcist for 25 years and says he has dealt with 70,000 cases of demonic possession, said that the consequences of satanic infiltration included power struggles at the Vatican as well as "cardinals who do not believe in Jesus, and bishops who are linked to the Demon".

He added: "When one speaks of 'the smoke of Satan' [a phrase coined by Pope Paul VI in 1972] in the holy rooms, it is all true – including these latest stories of violence and paedophilia."

The role of paedophilia in the Catholic Church seems well represented by the current Pope, Pope Benedict XVI, whose brother is linked to allegations of sex abuse in the church:



The Pope himself enforced the overriding Vatican decree to cover up sex abuse scandals in the church by silencing victims and moving around culprits:



Near the top of evil in this world is pedophilia which is effectively murdering knowledge of love for the victims. In this sense, the Catholic church has become a symbolic source of murdering the meaning of God's love (especially in terms of "fatherly love") in the world, the complete opposite of what Christ represents.

Furthermore, the Kremlin and the foundation of the Orthodox Church is murdering truth in the world and will soon unleash an apocalyptic nuclear holocaust that constitutes the ultimate act of premeditated mass murder.

Thus, the modern Christian Church, rather than being an ideal vessel for the return of Christ, has become the ultimate authoritarian vehicle for the rise of the Antichrist (who may be a pedophile himself!):

From outward appearances it would seem that the old Soviet Union has returned. A thing crucified, dead and buried has been resurrected. Four weeks after Vladimir Putin’s re-election, a procession led by the Patriarch of the Russian Orthodox Church arrived at the Church of Christ the Redeemer in Moscow. In keeping with ancient tradition the doors of the church were shut, symbolizing the sealed cave where Christ’s body was placed following crucifixion. “After midnight,” noted Russian journalist Anna Politkovskaya, “the Orthodox faithful taking part in the procession await the opening of the church doors. The patriarch stands on the steps at their head and is the first to enter the empty temple where the Resurrection of Christ has already occurred.” In due course the Patriarch offered up a prayer, the doors of the Church of Christ the Redeemer were opened and out stepped President Vladimir Putin. If any Christians were present for this ceremony they offered no protest to this blatant sacrilege. The woman who reported this event for the benefit of Western readers has since been assassinated. The KGB defector who was investigating the circumstances of her death has been poisoned (i.e., Litvinenko). [SOURCE]

Note that Vladimir Putin took power in Moscow on December 31st, 1999, at the turn of the Millenium. Given that a day is like a thousand years to the Lord, Putin's rise to power was supposed to symbolize how Christ rose on the third day, i.e., on January 1st, 2000, the holy (the term is used loosely here) Russian empire (i.e., the "Third Rome") and its 'tsar of tsars' (i.e., king of kings) "resurrected".

"Another Puzzle After Iran Moves Nuclear Fuel"

From a recent New York Times piece, Another Puzzle After Iran Moves Nuclear Fuel:

When Iran was caught last September building a secret, underground nuclear enrichment plant at a military base near the city of Qum, the country’s leaders insisted they had no other choice. With its nuclear facilities under constant threat of attack, they said, only a fool would leave them out in the open.

So imagine the surprise of international inspectors almost two weeks ago when they watched as Iran moved nearly its entire stockpile of low-enriched nuclear fuel to an above-ground plant. It was as if, one official noted, a bull’s-eye had been painted on it.

Why take such a huge risk?

That mystery is the subject of fervent debate among many who are trying to decode Iran’s intentions. The theories run from the bizarre to the mundane: Under one, Iran is actually taunting the Israelis to strike first. Under another, it is simply escalating the confrontation with the West to win further concessions in negotiations. (New York Times, 2/26/10)

Is someone finally sniffing the Cool-Aid and realizing something is not right?